This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2023 to 2024 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
|
|
School name
|
Middlethorpe Primary Academy
|
Number of pupils in school
|
225
|
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils
|
27%
|
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended)
|
3 years
|
Date this statement was published
|
15.9.23
|
Date on which it will be reviewed
|
1.9.24
|
Statement authorised by
|
Annabel Atkin
|
Pupil premium lead
|
Natalie Message
|
Governor / Trustee lead
|
Darren Holmes
|
Funding overview
Detail
|
Amount
|
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year
|
£88148
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year
|
£9280
|
Pupil premium (and recovery premium*) funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable)
*Recovery premium received in academic year 2021 to 2022 can be carried forward to academic year 2022 to 2023. Recovery premium received in academic year 2022 to 2023 cannot be carried forward to 2023 to 2024.
|
£0
|
Total budget for this academic year
If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year
|
£97428
|
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
At Middlethorpe Primary Academy we believe that every child should achieve to their full potential. We pride ourselves on having high aspirations and expectations of all pupils including those in vulnerable groups.
The allocation for Pupil Premium is carefully considered in relation to the context of the school and the needs of the children in receipt of the funding. The needs of the children are considered at a whole school, cohort and individual level. Our in depth knowledge of the needs of every child is used alongside the latest research from the EEF to inform our plans and provision.
Overall Objectives
- To narrow the attainment gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
- For all disadvantaged pupils to make at least good progress against national expectations
- To widen opportunities for disadvantaged pupils
Key Principles of the plan
- High expectations for all children and a belief that all children can achieve to the highest standard
- Quality first teaching
- Early intervention
- Flexibility of approach
- Multidimensional approach
Strategies of the approach
- Identifying the barriers to learning for disadvantaged pupils
- Identifying the patterns of achievement for disadvantaged pupils using internal and external data
- Identifying provision required at a group, cohort and individual level
- Use of data and diagnostic assessments to identify what is needed to improve
- Analyse the impact
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
|
|
1
|
SEMH needs
|
2
|
Speech and language development
|
3
|
Lower attainment on entry
|
4
|
Low aspirations
|
5
|
Lack of academic support at home
|
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
|
|
Accelerate the progress of children in receipt of pupil premium funding to close the attainment gap between them their peers.
|
PUP will make at least good progress from prior starting points
|
Increase the percentage of children in receipt of pupil premium funding attaining ARE or above.
|
Percentage of PUP achieving ARE or above will be in line with non PUP
|
SEMH
|
- Confident, independent learners who show a resilient attitude to all aspects of school life
- Children who are able to self-manage behaviour and ask for help when support is needed
|
Widen experiences
|
- Children are exposed to similar experiences of that of non PUP
- Aspirational children who have an understanding of the world they life in
|
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £11289
|
|
|
The use of ‘The Power of Reading’ subscriptions.
(Power of Reading £385)
Reading plus £2550
Resources to support schemes £425
|
- Internal data at the end of 22/23 showed that 34/61 (56%) PUP reached ARE+ in Writing (6/61, 10% attained GDS)
- Internal data at the end of 22/23 showed that 34/61 (56%) PUP reached ARE+ in Reading (7/61, 11% attained GDS)
- Writing approach centres around modelling writing and high aspirations combined with high quality texts to inspire.
|
2, 4
|
CPD programme for TAs and teachers including feedback, collaboration and metacognition)
(Contribution to Venue hire for ELT CPD events, Travel expenses £6500)
|
- EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium
- Clear programme of support and development to ensure all staff deliver quality first teaching in every lesson
|
1, 2, 3, 4
|
Continued investment in Little Wandle reading books and reading for pleasure books and paraphernalia
(£750 Little Wandle subscription, £130.00 Reading Teddies)
|
- Phonic screening results continue to be lower than in previous years.
- DfE guidance insists on fidelity to SSP programme of Phonics
- Enjoyment and attainment in reading has a direct impact on future academic success
|
1,2,3,4
|
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £68693.50
|
|
|
Targeted interventions in small groups and 1:1 to match need
(Yr6 HLTA interventions £15851.50
Yr5 TA afternoon
£7376
Yr4 TA afternoon interventions
£12484.07
Yr3 TA apprentice afternoon
£7859.94
Yr2 TA afternoon £7059
Yr1 TA morning
£7636.34
EYFS TA interventions £4789.25
|
- EEF state the importance of targeted group support by teachers and teaching assistants in academic attainment
- Small group and 1:1 support following diagnostic assessments allows specific gaps in attainment to be addressed
|
1, 2, 3,
|
Oracy
(Voice 21 - £1400)
|
- Oral language approaches have a high impact on pupil outcomes
- There is evidence to suggest that pupils from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to be behind their more advantaged counterparts in developing early language and speech skills, which may affect their school experience and learning later in their school lives
- Higher proportion of PUP have speech and language difficulties than non-PUP
|
1, 2, 3
|
Lexia
(£3832.00)
|
- Rigorous, personalised and structured approach to spelling and reading
- Accelerates the development of Literacy skills
|
1, 2
|
Letter-Join
(£380.40)
|
- EEF Summary Research suggests that slow or effortful handwriting (as well as spelling) takes most of children’s focus and limits the amount of thought that can be given to the content of their writing.
|
5
|
Number Stacks
(£25)
|
- Evidence demonstrates that using manipulatives strengths understanding of maths
- Internal data at the end of 22/23 showed that 37/61 (59%) PUP reached ARE+ in Maths (6/61, 10% attained GDS)
|
3, 4, 5
|
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £17445.50
|
|
|
SEMH support including Thrive
Subscription March 23 to March 24 £930
TA afternoon £10465.50)
|
- Higher percentage of PUP with SEMH needs than non PUP.
- Evidence suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds have, on average, weaker SEL skills at all ages than their more affluent peers. These skills are likely to influence a range of outcomes for pupils: lower SEL skills are linked with poorer mental health and lower academic attainment.
|
3, 4, 5
|
Metacognition and self-regulation strategies taught
|
- Evidence states that disadvantaged pupils are less likely to use metacognitive and self-regulatory strategies without being explicitly taught these strategies.
|
1, 2
|
Residential visits and school trips
(50% Subsidised residential trips. £2500)
(Subsidised school trips £1350)
|
- Children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to be able to afford additional costs relating to school visits
- All children should be given the same opportunity to wider curricular experiences.
|
3, 4
|
Extracurricular activities including music lessons
(£2200)
|
- Due to high costs of private lessons, many PUP children will not have the opportunity to experience music or extra curricular lessons outside of school
|
3, 4
|
Charanga £200
Resources £100
|
- All children should have the opportunity to high quality music lessons to broaden experiences.
|
4, 5
|
Language Angels £249
|
- All children in KS2 should have the opportunity to high quality MFL lessons to broaden experiences.
|
4, 5
|
Total budgeted cost: £ 97,428
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
Overall progress during academic year 22/23 was all positive from a lower starting point. Those children in receipt of Pupil Premium funding received quality first teaching and a range of targeted interventions and wider strategies. Social and emotional wellbeing was a focus with the school adopting the Thrive Approach.
Out of the 7 PUP children at the end of KS2 29% achieved ARE or above in Reading and 57% in Writing and Maths. 29% met expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined.
Externally provided programmes
|
|
Little Wandle
|
Wandle Learning Trust
|
Times Tables Rockstars
|
Times Tables Rockstars
|
Sumdog
|
Sumdog
|
Lexia
|
Lexia
|
Reading Plus
|
Reading Plus
|
Charanga
|
Charanga Ltd
|
Power of Reading
|
Centre for Literacy in Primary Education
|
White Rose Maths
|
White Rose Maths
|
Number Stacks
|
Number Stacks
|
Language Angels
|
Nubridge Publishing Limited
|
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2021 to 2022 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
|
|
School name
|
Middlethorpe Primary Academy
|
Number of pupils in school
|
237
|
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils
|
24%
|
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended)
|
3 years
|
Date this statement was published
|
1.10.22
|
Date on which it will be reviewed
|
1.9.23
|
Statement authorised by
|
Annabel Atkin
|
Pupil premium lead
|
Natalie Message
|
Governor / Trustee lead
|
Darren Holmes
|
Funding overview
Detail
|
Amount
|
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year
|
£79,050
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year
|
£ 6090
|
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable)
|
£0
|
Total budget for this academic year
If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year
|
£85,140
|
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
At Middlethorpe Primary Academy we believe that every child should achieve to their full potential. We pride ourselves on having high aspirations and expectations of all pupils including those in vulnerable groups.
The allocation for Pupil Premium is carefully considered in relation to the context of the school and the needs of the children in receipt of the funding. The needs of the children are considered at a whole school, cohort and individual level. Our in depth knowledge of the needs of every child is used alongside the latest research from the EEF to inform our plans and provision.
Overall Objectives
- To narrow the attainment gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
- For all disadvantaged pupils to make at least good progress against national expectations
- To widen opportunities for disadvantaged pupils
Key Principles of the plan
- High expectations for all children and a belief that all children can achieve to the highest standard
- Quality first teaching
- Early intervention
- Flexibility of approach
- Multidimensional approach
Strategies of the approach
- Identifying the barriers to learning for disadvantaged pupils
- Identifying the patterns of achievement for disadvantaged pupils using internal and external data
- Identifying provision required at a group, cohort and individual level
- Use of data and diagnostic assessments to identify what is needed to improve
- Analyse the impact
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
|
|
1
|
SEMH needs
|
2
|
Speech and language development
|
3
|
Lower attainment on entry
|
4
|
Low aspirations
|
5
|
Lack of academic support at home
|
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
|
|
Accelerate the progress of children in receipt of pupil premium funding to close the attainment gap between them their peers.
|
PUP will make at least good progress from prior starting points
|
Increase the percentage of children in receipt of pupil premium funding attaining ARE or above.
|
Percentage of PUP achieving ARE or above will be in line with non PUP
|
SEMH
|
- Confident, independent learners who show a resilient attitude to all aspects of school life
- Children who are able to self-manage behaviour and ask for help when support is needed
|
Widen experiences
|
- Children are exposed to similar experiences of that of non PUP
- Aspirational children who have an understanding of the world they life in
|
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £5,352.53
|
|
|
The use of ‘The Write Stuff’ along side ‘The Power of Reading’ subscriptions.
(The Write Stuff £1083.33, Power of Reading £350)
|
- Internal data at the end of 21/22 showed that 29/49 (59%) PUP reached ARE+ in Writing (4/49, 8% attained GDS)
- Internal data at the end of 21/22 showed that 33/49 (67%) PUP reached ARE+ in Reading (5/49, 10% attained GDS)
- Writing approach centres around modelling writing and high aspirations combined with high quality texts to inspire.
|
2, 4
|
CPD programme for TAs and teachers including feedback, collaboration and metacognition)
(Contribution to Venue hire for ELT CPD events, Travel expenses £3000)
|
- EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium
- Clear programme of support and development to ensure all staff deliver quality first teaching in every lesson
|
1, 2, 3, 4
|
Training and support for early career teacher.
(UCL)
|
- EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium.
- Those at the earliest stage in their career require additional support.
|
1, 2, 3, 4
|
Continued investment in Little Wandle reading books and reading for pleasure books and paraphernalia
(£750 Little Wandle subscription, £169.20 Reading Teddies)
|
- Phonic screening results continue to be lower than in previous years.
- DfE guidance insists on fidelity to SSP programme of Phonics
- Enjoyment and attainment in reading has a direct impact on future academic success
|
1,2,3,4
|
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £65925.47
|
|
|
Targeted interventions in small groups and 1:1 to match need
(Yr6 HLTA interventions £112.27 per day = £21331.30
Yr5 TA afternoon interventions £32.43 per afternoon = £6161.70
Yr4 TA afternoon interventions £31.60 per afternoon = £6004
Yr3 TA apprentice afternoon interventions £18.45 per afternoon = £3505.50
Yr2 TA afternoon interventions £31.60 per afternoon = £6004
Yr1 TA morning interventions = £3500
EYFS TA interventions = £2069.61
TA Friday afternoon interventions £25.94
=£933.84
=£49509.95)
|
- EEF state the importance of targeted group support by teachers and teaching assistants in academic attainment
- Small group and 1:1 support following diagnostic assessments allows specific gaps in attainment to be addressed
|
1, 2, 3,
|
Oracy
(Nuffield Early Language Intervention)
|
- Oral language approaches have a high impact on pupil outcomes
- There is evidence to suggest that pupils from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to be behind their more advantaged counterparts in developing early language and speech skills, which may affect their school experience and learning later in their school lives
- Higher proportion of PUP have speech and language difficulties than non-PUP
|
1, 2, 3
|
Use of Reading Plus programme
(£2517.52)
|
- Attainment in reading has an impact on future academic achievement
- Reading comprehension is a crucial component of reading instruction.
- Due to lack of parental support PUP children are read with less at home and have less variety of books in their homes- reading plus offers variety and develops exposure of a range of genres
- It is an adaptive programme to improve vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, stamina and motivation in reading
|
1, 2
|
Lexia
(£3449.80)
|
- Rigorous, personalised and structured approach to spelling and reading
- Accelerates the development of Literacy skills
|
1, 2
|
TA support for Year 3
(£10,118)
|
- Year 3 have suffered as a result of the global pandemic during a key milestone in their child development. In addition to inconsistency in staffing over the last 2 years (4 teachers).
- It has the highest proportion of PUP children. (11/28 = 39%)
|
1, 2, 4, 5
|
Letter-Join
(£380.40)
|
- EEF Summary Research suggests that slow or effortful handwriting (as well as spelling) takes most of children’s focus and limits the amount of thought that can be given to the content of their writing.
|
5
|
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £13,862
|
|
|
SEMH support including Thrive
(Childhood practitioner course £1443
Leading emotionally healthy primary schools £548
Thrive together modules 1-5 £563
Subscription March 22 to March 23 £864
TA afternoon interventions £31.60 per afternoon = £6004)
|
- Higher percentage of PUP with SEMH needs than non PUP.
- Evidence suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds have, on average, weaker SEL skills at all ages than their more affluent peers. These skills are likely to influence a range of outcomes for pupils: lower SEL skills are linked with poorer mental health and lower academic attainment.
|
3, 4, 5
|
Metacognition and self-regulation strategies taught
|
- Evidence states that disadvantaged pupils are less likely to use metacognitive and self-regulatory strategies without being explicitly taught these strategies.
|
1, 2
|
Residential visits and school trips
(50% Subsidised residential trips. £3000)
|
- Children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to be able to afford additional costs relating to school visits
- All children should be given the same opportunity to wider curricular experiences.
|
3, 4
|
Extracurricular activities including music lessons
(£1440)
|
- All children should have the opportunity to music lessons to broaden experiences.
- Due to high costs of private lessons, many PUP children will not have the opportunity to experience music lessons outside of school
|
3, 4
|
Total budgeted cost: £ 85,140
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
Overall progress during academic year 21/22 was all positive from a much lower starting point due to the pandemic. Those children in receipt of Pupil Premium funding received quality first teaching and a range of targeted interventions and wider strategies. Social and emotional wellbeing was a focus and the impact of the pandemic on this.
Progress at the end of KS2
Reading 50% good progress and 13% better than expected progress
Writing 63% good progress
Maths 75% good progress and 13% better than expected progress
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England
|
|
Little Wandle
|
Wandle Learning Trust
|
Times Tables Rockstars
|
Times Tables Rockstars
|
Sumdog
|
Sumdog
|
Spelling Shed
|
Edshed
|
Lexia
|
Lexia
|
Reading Plus
|
Reading Plus
|
Charanga
|
Charanga Ltd
|
The Write Stuff
|
Jane Considine
|
Power of Reading
|
Centre for Literacy in Primary Education
|
White Rose Maths
|
White Rose Maths
|
Number Stacks
|
Number Stacks
|
Language Angels
|
Nubridge Publishing Limited
|
|
|
School name
|
Middlethorpe Primary Academy
|
Number of pupils in school
|
209
|
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils
|
32%
|
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended)
|
3 years
|
Date this statement was published
|
September 2021
|
Date on which it will be reviewed
|
September 2022
|
Statement authorised by
|
Rachel Simpson
|
Pupil premium lead
|
Lesley Bebbington
|
Governor / Trustee lead
|
Darren Holmes
|
Funding overview
Detail
|
Amount
|
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year
|
£52,455
|
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year
|
£ 6525
|
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable)
|
£
|
Total budget for this academic year
If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year
|
£58,980
|
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
At Middlethorpe Primary Academy we believe that every child should achieve to their full potential. We pride ourselves on having high aspirations and expectations of all pupils including those in vulnerable groups.
The allocation for Pupil Premium is carefully considered in relation to the context of the school and the needs of the children in receipt of the funding. The needs of the children are considered at a whole school, cohort and individual level. Our in depth knowledge of the needs of every child is used alongside the latest research from the EEF to inform our plans and provision.
Overall Objectives
- To narrow the attainment gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
- For all disadvantaged pupils to make at least good progress against national expectations
- To widen opportunities for disadvantaged pupils
Key Principles of the plan
- High expectations for all children and a belief that all children can achieve to the highest standard
- Quality first teaching
- Early intervention
- Flexibility of approach
- Multidimensional approach
Strategies of the approach
- Identifying the barriers to learning for disadvantaged pupils
- Identifying the patterns of achievement for disadvantaged pupils using internal and external data
- Identifying provision required at a group, cohort and individual level
- Use of data and diagnostic assessments to identify what is needed to improve
- Analyse the impact
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
|
|
1
|
SEMH needs
|
2
|
Speech and language development
|
3
|
Lower attainment on entry
|
4
|
Low aspirations
|
5
|
Lack of academic support at home further impacted by the global pandemic
|
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
|
|
Accelerate the progress of children in receipt of pupil premium funding to close the attainment gap between them their peers.
|
PUP will make at least good progress from prior starting points
|
Increase the percentage of children in receipt of pupil premium funding attaining ARE or above.
|
Percentage of PUP achieving ARE or above will be in line with non PUP
|
SEMH
|
- Confident, independent learners who show a resilient attitude to all aspects of school life
- Children who are able to self-manage behaviour and ask for help when support is needed
|
Widen experiences
|
- Children are exposed to similar experiences of that of non PUP
- Aspirational children who have an understanding of the world they life in
|
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £ 8,317
|
|
|
Whole school training and implementation of ‘The Write Stuff’
(£1317)
|
- Internal data at the end of 20/21 showed that writing attainment in all year groups was lower than in other subjects
- Internal data at the end of 20/21 showed writing attainment was significantly lower than in previous years
- Writing was identified as an issue when children returned from both lockdowns
- Approach centres around modelling writing and high aspirations
|
1, 2
|
CPD programme for TAs and teachers including feedback, collaboration and metacognition)
(£3000)
|
- EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium
- Clear programme of support and development to ensure all staff deliver quality first teaching in every lesson
|
1, 2, 3, 4
|
Training and support for early career teachers.
(£2000)
|
- EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium.
- Those at the earliest stage in their career require additional support.
|
1, 2, 3, 4
|
Investment in Read Write Inc reading books and reading for pleasure books.
(£2000)
|
- Phonic screening results were lower last year than in previous years as a result of lockdowns and school closure.
- Enjoyment and attainment in reading has a direct impact on future academic success
|
1,2,3,4
|
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £38,300
|
|
|
Targeted interventions in small groups and 1:1 to match need
(£30000)
|
- EEF state the importance of targeted group support by teachers and teaching assistants in academic attainment
- Small group and 1:1 support following diagnostic assessments allows specific gaps in attainment to be addressed
|
1, 2, 3,
|
Oracy
|
- Oral language approaches have a high impact on pupil outcomes
- There is evidence to suggest that pupils from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to be behind their more advantaged counterparts in developing early language and speech skills, which may affect their school experience and learning later in their school lives
- Higher proportion of PUP have speech and language difficulties than non-PUP
|
1, 2, 3
|
Use of Reading Plus programme
(£4000)
|
- Attainment in reading has an impact on future academic achievement
- Reading comprehension is a crucial component of reading instruction.
- Due to lack of parental support PUP children are read with less at home and have less variety of books in their homes- reading plus offers variety and develops exposure of a range of genres
- It is an adaptive programme to improve vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, stamina and motivation in reading
|
1, 2
|
Lexia
(£4300)
|
- Rigorous, personalised and structured approach to spelling and reading
- Accelerates the development of Literacy skills
|
1, 2
|
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £12,500
|
|
|
SEMH support including Emotional Literacy Support
(£8,000)
|
- Higher percentage of PUP with SEMH needs than non PUP.
- Evidence suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds have, on average, weaker SEL skills at all ages than their more affluent peers. These skills are likely to influence a range of outcomes for pupils: lower SEL skills are linked with poorer mental health and lower academic attainment.
|
3
|
Metacognition and self-regulation strategies taught
|
- Evidence states that disadvantaged pupils are less likely to use metacognitive and self-regulatory strategies without being explicitly taught these strategies.
|
1, 2
|
Residential visits and school trips
(£2000)
|
- Children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to be able to afford additional costs relating to school visits
- All children should be given the same opportunity to wider curricular experiences.
|
3, 4
|
Extracurricular activities including music lessons
(£2500)
|
- All children should have the opportunity to music lessons to broaden experiences.
- Due to high costs of private lessons, many PUP children will not have the opportunity to experience music lessons outside of school
|
3, 4
|
Enrichment afternoons
|
- Provide opportunities that children may not otherwise have access to
|
3, 4
|
Total budgeted cost: £ 59,117
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2020 to 2021 academic year.
Overall progress during academic year 20/21 was all positive from a much lower starting point due to the pandemic. Those children in receipt of Pupil Premium funding received quality first teaching and a range of targeted interventions and wider strategies. Social and emotional wellbeing was a focus and the impact of the pandemic on this.
Progress at the end of KS2
Reading 86% good progress and 29% better than expected progress
Writing 57% good progress and 14% better than expected progress
Maths 71% good progress
Externally provided programmes
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England
|
|
Read, Write Inc
|
Ruth Miskin Read, Write Inc
|
Times Tables Rockstars
|
Times Tables Rockstars
|
Spelling Shed
|
Edshed
|
Lexia
|
Lexia
|
Reading Plus
|
Reading Plus
|
Pixl
|
Pixl
|
Service pupil premium funding (optional)
For schools that receive this funding, you may wish to provide the following information:
|
|
How did you spend your service pupil premium allocation last academic year?
|
|
What was the impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils?
|
|
Further information (optional)
Use this space to provide any further information about your pupil premium strategy. For example, about your strategy planning, or other activity that you are implementing to support disadvantaged pupils, that is not dependent on pupil premium or recovery premium funding.
|
|