Pupil premium is funding to improve education outcomes for disadvantaged pupils in schools in England. Evidence shows that disadvantaged children generally face additional challenges in reaching their potential at school and often do not perform as well as other pupils.

Schools receive £1345 per pupil for pupils who are eligible for free school meals, or have been eligible in the past 6 years. The Department for Education believes school leaders are best placed to assess their pupils’ needs and use the funding to improve attainment, drawing on evidence of effective practice. It is therefore up to school leaders to decide how to spend the pupil premium.

The strategy reports below detail how Middlethorpe Primary Academy spends its Pupil Premium grant, and the impact of that spending to date.

Pupil premium strategy statement – Middlethorpe Primary Academy

This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2023 to 2024 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.

It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.

School overview

Detail

Data

School name

Middlethorpe Primary Academy

Number of pupils in school

225   

Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils

27%

Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended)

3 years

Date this statement was published

15.9.23

Date on which it will be reviewed

1.9.24

Statement authorised by

Annabel Atkin

Pupil premium lead

Natalie Message

Governor / Trustee lead

Darren Holmes

Funding overview

Detail

Amount

Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year

£88148

Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year

£9280

Pupil premium (and recovery premium*) funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable)

*Recovery premium received in academic year 2021 to 2022 can be carried forward to academic year 2022 to 2023. Recovery premium received in academic year 2022 to 2023 cannot be carried forward to 2023 to 2024.

£0

Total budget for this academic year

If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year

£97428

Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan

Statement of intent

At Middlethorpe Primary Academy we believe that every child should achieve to their full potential. We pride ourselves on having high aspirations and expectations of all pupils including those in vulnerable groups.

The allocation for Pupil Premium is carefully considered in relation to the context of the school and the needs of the children in receipt of the funding. The needs of the children are considered at a whole school, cohort and individual level. Our in depth knowledge of the needs of every child is used alongside the latest research from the EEF to inform our plans and provision.

Overall Objectives

  • To narrow the attainment gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
  • For all disadvantaged pupils to make at least good progress against national expectations
  • To widen opportunities for disadvantaged pupils

Key Principles of the plan

  • High expectations for all children and a belief that all children can achieve to the highest standard
  • Quality first teaching
  • Early intervention
  • Flexibility of approach
  • Multidimensional approach

Strategies of the approach

  • Identifying the barriers to learning for disadvantaged pupils
  • Identifying the patterns of achievement for disadvantaged pupils using internal and external data
  • Identifying provision required at a group, cohort and individual level
  • Use of data and diagnostic assessments to identify what is needed to improve
  • Analyse the impact

 

Challenges

This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.

Challenge number

Detail of challenge

1

SEMH needs

2

Speech and language development

3

Lower attainment on entry

4

Low aspirations

5

Lack of academic support at home

Intended outcomes

This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.

Intended outcome

Success criteria

Accelerate the progress of children in receipt of pupil premium funding to close the attainment gap between them their peers.

PUP will make at least good progress from prior starting points

Increase the percentage of children in receipt of pupil premium funding attaining ARE or above.

Percentage of PUP achieving ARE or above will be in line with non PUP

SEMH

  • Confident, independent learners who show a resilient attitude to all aspects of school life
  • Children who are able to self-manage behaviour and ask for help when support is needed

Widen experiences

  • Children are exposed to similar experiences of that of non PUP
  • Aspirational children who have an understanding of the world they life in

Activity in this academic year

This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.

 

 

Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)

Budgeted cost: £11289

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

The use of ‘The Power of Reading’ subscriptions.

(Power of Reading £385)

Reading plus £2550

Resources to support schemes £425

  • Internal data at the end of 22/23 showed that 34/61 (56%) PUP reached ARE+ in Writing (6/61, 10% attained GDS)
  • Internal data at the end of 22/23 showed that 34/61 (56%) PUP reached ARE+ in Reading (7/61, 11% attained GDS)
  • Writing approach centres around modelling writing and high aspirations combined with high quality texts to inspire.

2, 4

CPD programme for TAs and teachers including feedback, collaboration and metacognition)

(Contribution to Venue hire for ELT CPD events, Travel expenses £6500)

  • EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium
  • Clear programme of support and development to ensure all staff deliver quality first teaching in every lesson

1, 2, 3, 4

Continued investment in Little Wandle reading books and reading for pleasure books and paraphernalia

(£750 Little Wandle subscription, £130.00 Reading Teddies)

  • Phonic screening results continue to be lower than in previous years.
  • DfE guidance insists on fidelity to SSP programme of Phonics
  • Enjoyment and attainment in reading has a direct impact on future academic success

1,2,3,4

 

Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)

Budgeted cost: £68693.50

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

Targeted interventions in small groups and 1:1 to match need

(Yr6 HLTA interventions £15851.50

Yr5 TA afternoon

£7376

Yr4 TA afternoon interventions

£12484.07

Yr3 TA apprentice afternoon

 £7859.94

Yr2 TA afternoon  £7059

Yr1 TA morning  

£7636.34

EYFS TA interventions £4789.25

 

  • EEF state the importance of targeted group support by teachers and teaching assistants in academic attainment
  • Small group and 1:1 support following diagnostic assessments allows specific gaps in attainment to be addressed

1, 2, 3,

Oracy 

(Voice 21 - £1400)

 

  • Oral language approaches have a high impact on pupil outcomes
  • There is evidence to suggest that pupils from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to be behind their more advantaged counterparts in developing early language and speech skills, which may affect their school experience and learning later in their school lives
  • Higher proportion of PUP have speech and language difficulties than non-PUP

1, 2, 3

Lexia

(£3832.00)

  • Rigorous, personalised and structured approach to spelling and reading
  • Accelerates the development of Literacy skills

1, 2

Letter-Join

(£380.40)

  • EEF Summary Research suggests that slow or effortful handwriting (as well as spelling) takes most of children’s focus and limits the amount of thought that can be given to the content of their writing.

5

Number Stacks

(£25)

  • Evidence demonstrates that using manipulatives strengths understanding of maths
  • Internal data at the end of 22/23 showed that 37/61 (59%) PUP reached ARE+ in Maths (6/61, 10% attained GDS)

3, 4, 5

 

 

 

Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)

Budgeted cost: £17445.50

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

SEMH support including Thrive

Subscription March 23 to March 24  £930

TA afternoon £10465.50)

  • Higher percentage of PUP with SEMH needs than non PUP.
  • Evidence suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds have, on average, weaker SEL skills at all ages than their more affluent peers. These skills are likely to influence a range of outcomes for pupils: lower SEL skills are linked with poorer mental health and lower academic attainment.

3, 4, 5

Metacognition and self-regulation strategies taught

  • Evidence states that disadvantaged pupils are less likely to use metacognitive and self-regulatory strategies without being explicitly taught these strategies. 

1, 2

Residential visits and school trips

(50% Subsidised residential trips. £2500)

(Subsidised school trips £1350)

  • Children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to be able to afford additional costs relating to school visits
  • All children should be given the same opportunity to wider curricular experiences.

3, 4

Extracurricular activities including music lessons

(£2200)

 

  • Due to high costs of private lessons, many PUP children will not have the opportunity to experience music or extra curricular lessons outside of school

3, 4

Charanga £200

Resources £100

  • All children should have the opportunity to high quality music lessons to broaden experiences.

4, 5

Language Angels £249

  • All children in KS2 should have the opportunity to high quality MFL lessons to broaden experiences.

4, 5

 

Total budgeted cost: £ 97,428

Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year

Pupil premium strategy outcomes

Overall progress during academic year 22/23 was all positive from a lower starting point. Those children in receipt of Pupil Premium funding received quality first teaching and a range of targeted interventions and wider strategies. Social and emotional wellbeing was a focus with the school adopting the Thrive Approach.

A close-up of a chart

Description automatically generatedOut of the 7 PUP children at the end of KS2 29% achieved ARE or above in Reading and 57% in Writing and Maths. 29% met expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined.

 

Externally provided programmes

 

Programme

Provider

Little Wandle

Wandle Learning Trust

Times Tables Rockstars

Times Tables Rockstars

Sumdog

Sumdog

Lexia

Lexia

Reading Plus

Reading Plus

Charanga

Charanga Ltd

Power of Reading

Centre for Literacy in Primary Education

White Rose Maths

White Rose Maths

Number Stacks

Number Stacks

Language Angels

Nubridge Publishing Limited

 

Pupil premium strategy statement

This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2021 to 2022 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.

It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.

School overview

Detail

Data

School name

Middlethorpe Primary Academy

Number of pupils in school

237

Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils

24%

Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended)

3 years

Date this statement was published

1.10.22

Date on which it will be reviewed

1.9.23

Statement authorised by

Annabel Atkin

Pupil premium lead

Natalie Message

Governor / Trustee lead

Darren Holmes

Funding overview

Detail

Amount

Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year

£79,050

Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year

£ 6090

Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable)

£0

Total budget for this academic year

If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year

£85,140

Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan

Statement of intent

At Middlethorpe Primary Academy we believe that every child should achieve to their full potential. We pride ourselves on having high aspirations and expectations of all pupils including those in vulnerable groups.

The allocation for Pupil Premium is carefully considered in relation to the context of the school and the needs of the children in receipt of the funding. The needs of the children are considered at a whole school, cohort and individual level. Our in depth knowledge of the needs of every child is used alongside the latest research from the EEF to inform our plans and provision.

Overall Objectives

  • To narrow the attainment gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
  • For all disadvantaged pupils to make at least good progress against national expectations
  • To widen opportunities for disadvantaged pupils

Key Principles of the plan

  • High expectations for all children and a belief that all children can achieve to the highest standard
  • Quality first teaching
  • Early intervention
  • Flexibility of approach
  • Multidimensional approach

Strategies of the approach

  • Identifying the barriers to learning for disadvantaged pupils
  • Identifying the patterns of achievement for disadvantaged pupils using internal and external data
  • Identifying provision required at a group, cohort and individual level
  • Use of data and diagnostic assessments to identify what is needed to improve
  • Analyse the impact

 

Challenges

This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.

Challenge number

Detail of challenge

1

SEMH needs

2

Speech and language development

3

Lower attainment on entry

4

Low aspirations

5

Lack of academic support at home

Intended outcomes

This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.

Intended outcome

Success criteria

Accelerate the progress of children in receipt of pupil premium funding to close the attainment gap between them their peers.

PUP will make at least good progress from prior starting points

Increase the percentage of children in receipt of pupil premium funding attaining ARE or above.

Percentage of PUP achieving ARE or above will be in line with non PUP

SEMH

  • Confident, independent learners who show a resilient attitude to all aspects of school life
  • Children who are able to self-manage behaviour and ask for help when support is needed

Widen experiences

  • Children are exposed to similar experiences of that of non PUP
  • Aspirational children who have an understanding of the world they life in

 

 

 

Activity in this academic year

This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.

Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)

Budgeted cost: £5,352.53

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

The use of ‘The Write Stuff’ along side ‘The Power of Reading’ subscriptions.

(The Write Stuff £1083.33, Power of Reading £350)

  • Internal data at the end of 21/22 showed that 29/49 (59%) PUP reached ARE+ in Writing (4/49, 8% attained GDS)
  • Internal data at the end of 21/22 showed that 33/49 (67%) PUP reached ARE+ in Reading (5/49, 10% attained GDS)
  • Writing approach centres around modelling writing and high aspirations combined with high quality texts to inspire.

2, 4

CPD programme for TAs and teachers including feedback, collaboration and metacognition)

(Contribution to Venue hire for ELT CPD events, Travel expenses £3000)

  • EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium
  • Clear programme of support and development to ensure all staff deliver quality first teaching in every lesson

1, 2, 3, 4

Training and support for early career teacher.

(UCL)

  • EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium.
  • Those at the earliest stage in their career require additional support.

1, 2, 3, 4

Continued investment in Little Wandle reading books and reading for pleasure books and paraphernalia

(£750 Little Wandle subscription, £169.20 Reading Teddies)

  • Phonic screening results continue to be lower than in previous years.
  • DfE guidance insists on fidelity to SSP programme of Phonics
  • Enjoyment and attainment in reading has a direct impact on future academic success

1,2,3,4

 

Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)

Budgeted cost: £65925.47

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

Targeted interventions in small groups and 1:1 to match need

(Yr6 HLTA interventions £112.27 per day = £21331.30

Yr5 TA afternoon interventions £32.43 per afternoon = £6161.70

Yr4 TA afternoon interventions £31.60 per afternoon = £6004

Yr3 TA apprentice afternoon interventions £18.45 per afternoon = £3505.50

Yr2 TA afternoon interventions £31.60 per afternoon = £6004

Yr1 TA morning interventions = £3500

EYFS TA interventions = £2069.61

TA Friday afternoon interventions £25.94

=£933.84

=£49509.95)

  • EEF state the importance of targeted group support by teachers and teaching assistants in academic attainment
  • Small group and 1:1 support following diagnostic assessments allows specific gaps in attainment to be addressed

1, 2, 3,

Oracy 

(Nuffield Early Language Intervention)

  • Oral language approaches have a high impact on pupil outcomes
  • There is evidence to suggest that pupils from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to be behind their more advantaged counterparts in developing early language and speech skills, which may affect their school experience and learning later in their school lives
  • Higher proportion of PUP have speech and language difficulties than non-PUP

1, 2, 3

Use of Reading Plus programme

(£2517.52)

  • Attainment in reading has an impact on future academic achievement
  • Reading comprehension is a crucial component of reading instruction.
  • Due to lack of parental support PUP children are read with less at home and have less variety of books in their homes- reading plus offers variety and develops exposure of a range of genres
  • It is an adaptive programme to improve vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, stamina and motivation in reading

1, 2

Lexia

(£3449.80)

  • Rigorous, personalised and structured approach to spelling and reading
  • Accelerates the development of Literacy skills

1, 2

TA support for Year 3

(£10,118)

  • Year 3 have suffered as a result of the global pandemic during a key milestone in their child development.  In addition to inconsistency in staffing over the last 2 years (4 teachers).
  • It has the highest proportion of PUP children. (11/28 = 39%)

1, 2, 4, 5

Letter-Join

(£380.40)

  • EEF Summary Research suggests that slow or effortful handwriting (as well as spelling) takes most of children’s focus and limits the amount of thought that can be given to the content of their writing.

5

 

 

Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)

Budgeted cost: £13,862

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

SEMH support including Thrive

(Childhood practitioner course  £1443  

Leading emotionally healthy primary schools  £548  

Thrive together modules 1-5  £563

Subscription March 22 to March 23  £864

TA afternoon interventions £31.60 per afternoon = £6004)

  • Higher percentage of PUP with SEMH needs than non PUP.
  • Evidence suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds have, on average, weaker SEL skills at all ages than their more affluent peers. These skills are likely to influence a range of outcomes for pupils: lower SEL skills are linked with poorer mental health and lower academic attainment.

3, 4, 5

Metacognition and self-regulation strategies taught

  • Evidence states that disadvantaged pupils are less likely to use metacognitive and self-regulatory strategies without being explicitly taught these strategies. 

1, 2

Residential visits and school trips

(50% Subsidised residential trips. £3000)

  • Children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to be able to afford additional costs relating to school visits
  • All children should be given the same opportunity to wider curricular experiences.

3, 4

Extracurricular activities including music lessons

(£1440)

  • All children should have the opportunity to music lessons to broaden experiences.
  • Due to high costs of private lessons, many PUP children will not have the opportunity to experience music lessons outside of school

3, 4

 

Total budgeted cost: £ 85,140

Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year

Pupil premium strategy outcomes

Overall progress during academic year 21/22 was all positive from a much lower starting point due to the pandemic. Those children in receipt of Pupil Premium funding received quality first teaching and a range of targeted interventions and wider strategies. Social and emotional wellbeing was a focus and the impact of the pandemic on this.

Progress at the end of KS2

Reading 50% good progress and 13% better than expected progress

Writing 63% good progress

Maths 75% good progress and 13% better than expected progress

 

Externally provided programmes

Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England

Programme

Provider

Little Wandle

Wandle Learning Trust

Times Tables Rockstars

Times Tables Rockstars

Sumdog

Sumdog

Spelling Shed

Edshed

Lexia

Lexia

Reading Plus

Reading Plus

Charanga

Charanga Ltd

The Write Stuff

Jane Considine

Power of Reading

Centre for Literacy in Primary Education

White Rose Maths

White Rose Maths

Number Stacks

Number Stacks

Language Angels

Nubridge Publishing Limited

 

 

Pupil premium strategy / self-evaluation

 

Detail

Data

School name

Middlethorpe Primary Academy

Number of pupils in school

209

Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils

32%

Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended)

3 years

Date this statement was published

September 2021

Date on which it will be reviewed

September 2022

Statement authorised by

Rachel Simpson

Pupil premium lead

Lesley Bebbington

Governor / Trustee lead

Darren Holmes

Funding overview

Detail

Amount

Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year

£52,455

Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year

£ 6525

Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable)

£

Total budget for this academic year

If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year

£58,980

Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan

Statement of intent

At Middlethorpe Primary Academy we believe that every child should achieve to their full potential. We pride ourselves on having high aspirations and expectations of all pupils including those in vulnerable groups.

The allocation for Pupil Premium is carefully considered in relation to the context of the school and the needs of the children in receipt of the funding. The needs of the children are considered at a whole school, cohort and individual level. Our in depth knowledge of the needs of every child is used alongside the latest research from the EEF to inform our plans and provision.

Overall Objectives

  • To narrow the attainment gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils
  • For all disadvantaged pupils to make at least good progress against national expectations
  • To widen opportunities for disadvantaged pupils

Key Principles of the plan

  • High expectations for all children and a belief that all children can achieve to the highest standard
  • Quality first teaching
  • Early intervention
  • Flexibility of approach
  • Multidimensional approach

Strategies of the approach

  • Identifying the barriers to learning for disadvantaged pupils
  • Identifying the patterns of achievement for disadvantaged pupils using internal and external data
  • Identifying provision required at a group, cohort and individual level
  • Use of data and diagnostic assessments to identify what is needed to improve
  • Analyse the impact

 

Challenges

This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.

Challenge number

Detail of challenge

1

SEMH needs

2

Speech and language development

3

Lower attainment on entry

4

Low aspirations

5

Lack of academic support at home further impacted by the global pandemic

Intended outcomes

This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.

Intended outcome

Success criteria

Accelerate the progress of children in receipt of pupil premium funding to close the attainment gap between them their peers.

PUP will make at least good progress from prior starting points

Increase the percentage of children in receipt of pupil premium funding attaining ARE or above.

Percentage of PUP achieving ARE or above will be in line with non PUP

SEMH

  • Confident, independent learners who show a resilient attitude to all aspects of school life
  • Children who are able to self-manage behaviour and ask for help when support is needed

Widen experiences

  • Children are exposed to similar experiences of that of non PUP
  • Aspirational children who have an understanding of the world they life in

 

 

 

Activity in this academic year

This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.

Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)

Budgeted cost: £ 8,317

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

Whole school training and implementation of ‘The Write Stuff’

(£1317)

  • Internal data at the end of 20/21 showed that writing attainment in all year groups was lower than in other subjects
  • Internal data at the end of 20/21 showed writing attainment was significantly lower than in previous years
  • Writing was identified as an issue when children returned from both lockdowns
  • Approach centres around modelling writing and high aspirations

1, 2

CPD programme for TAs and teachers including feedback, collaboration and metacognition)

(£3000)

  • EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium
  • Clear programme of support and development to ensure all staff deliver quality first teaching in every lesson

1, 2, 3, 4

Training and support for early career teachers.

(£2000)

  • EEF research found that using the Pupil Premium to improve teaching quality benefits all students and has a particularly positive effect on children eligible for the Pupil Premium.
  • Those at the earliest stage in their career require additional support.

1, 2, 3, 4

Investment in Read Write Inc reading books and reading for pleasure books.

(£2000)

  • Phonic screening results were lower last year than in previous years as a result of lockdowns and school closure.
  • Enjoyment and attainment in reading has a direct impact on future academic success

1,2,3,4

 

Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)

Budgeted cost: £38,300

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

Targeted interventions in small groups and 1:1 to match need

(£30000)

  • EEF state the importance of targeted group support by teachers and teaching assistants in academic attainment
  • Small group and 1:1 support following diagnostic assessments allows specific gaps in attainment to be addressed

1, 2, 3,

Oracy

  • Oral language approaches have a high impact on pupil outcomes
  • There is evidence to suggest that pupils from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to be behind their more advantaged counterparts in developing early language and speech skills, which may affect their school experience and learning later in their school lives
  • Higher proportion of PUP have speech and language difficulties than non-PUP

1, 2, 3

Use of Reading Plus programme

(£4000)

  • Attainment in reading has an impact on future academic achievement
  • Reading comprehension is a crucial component of reading instruction.
  • Due to lack of parental support PUP children are read with less at home and have less variety of books in their homes- reading plus offers variety and develops exposure of a range of genres
  • It is an adaptive programme to improve vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, stamina and motivation in reading

1, 2

Lexia

(£4300)

  • Rigorous, personalised and structured approach to spelling and reading
  • Accelerates the development of Literacy skills

1, 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)

Budgeted cost: £12,500

Activity

Evidence that supports this approach

Challenge number(s) addressed

SEMH support including Emotional Literacy Support

(£8,000)

  • Higher percentage of PUP with SEMH needs than non PUP.
  • Evidence suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds have, on average, weaker SEL skills at all ages than their more affluent peers. These skills are likely to influence a range of outcomes for pupils: lower SEL skills are linked with poorer mental health and lower academic attainment.

3

Metacognition and self-regulation strategies taught

  • Evidence states that disadvantaged pupils are less likely to use metacognitive and self-regulatory strategies without being explicitly taught these strategies. 

1, 2

Residential visits and school trips

(£2000)

  • Children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to be able to afford additional costs relating to school visits
  • All children should be given the same opportunity to wider curricular experiences.

3, 4

Extracurricular activities including music lessons

(£2500)

  • All children should have the opportunity to music lessons to broaden experiences.
  • Due to high costs of private lessons, many PUP children will not have the opportunity to experience music lessons outside of school

3, 4

Enrichment afternoons

  • Provide opportunities that children may not otherwise have access to

 

3, 4

 

Total budgeted cost: £ 59,117

Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year

Pupil premium strategy outcomes

This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2020 to 2021 academic year.

Overall progress during academic year 20/21 was all positive from a much lower starting point due to the pandemic. Those children in receipt of Pupil Premium funding received quality first teaching and a range of targeted interventions and wider strategies. Social and emotional wellbeing was a focus and the impact of the pandemic on this.

Progress at the end of KS2

Reading 86% good progress and 29% better than expected progress

Writing 57% good progress and 14% better than expected progress

Maths 71% good progress

 

Externally provided programmes

Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England

Programme

Provider

Read, Write Inc

Ruth Miskin Read, Write Inc

Times Tables Rockstars

Times Tables Rockstars

Spelling Shed

Edshed

Lexia

Lexia

Reading Plus

Reading Plus

Pixl

Pixl

Service pupil premium funding (optional)

For schools that receive this funding, you may wish to provide the following information:

Measure

Details

How did you spend your service pupil premium allocation last academic year?

 

What was the impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils?

 

Further information (optional)

Use this space to provide any further information about your pupil premium strategy. For example, about your strategy planning, or other activity that you are implementing to support disadvantaged pupils, that is not dependent on pupil premium or recovery premium funding.